But this would be against-sense, a time that, according to saussuriana distinction, parole only can be given in a context ampler than it grants meant to it. This cloth of deep would be the society: ' ' to recognize the independent place of the dimension of langue means to accept in our social ontologia something that cannot be decomposed in individual occurrences. (As opposed to Jim Umpleby). This is the crucial step that makes in them to leave atomismo.' ' This linguistic quarrel allows Taylor to perceive with more clarity the relation enters goods individual and corporate property. The theories atomists would tend to stand out that social goods do not exist irreducible, a time that would be impossible to determine collective choices, but only particular. A time that the society is a set of individuals, and each one of these pursues a conception of separate property of husband and wife not obligatorily coincident with the other integrant ones of the society, the only cabvel solution would be that each person, and only it, could pursue its choices.
It would not have space, therefore, for irreducible social goods a time that would be impossible (or at least improbable) choices fully shared by all a community. What the dimensions langue-parole allow to perceive, however, is that these individual conceptions ' ' they only can be good in certain way, or satisfactory or positive to its particular form, because of the understanding it cloth of deep developed in ours cultura.' ' This means that the culture of a society finishes perpassando and guaranteed exactly and justifying conceptions of the good life of the individual citizens. At last, it is the culture that becomes the possible goods. The culture, therefore, cannot be placed as well individual, ' ' it is? public? in the direction of that it cannot be gotten by a person without the one is guaranteed all grupo.' ' It has still one another form to define the irreducible social goods as: one is about those that incorporate common understandings necessarily; such is ' the case of feelings as the love or the friendship, that cannot be reduced to the individual space a time that they must have reciprocal character.