To know who he is the actor who plans, three things are important: Who is planning? …? Where it acts? …? What this actor makes? Its performance if of where type of fight or social intervention? (IT HISSES, 2005, 6) It was defined that the proper group would be the actor, the planner of the actions that would occur in its territory. To follow the problems had been argued which that actor would find to the fondness to modify the reality in the practical one and that they could influence or make it difficult its objectives. In other words, one transferred it As the Step of the Strategical Planning Situacional (FEET): The actor, wanting to modify its reality in the practical one, finds problems that make it difficult to reach its intentions. In this step, it is necessary to list all the problems that confuse the action of the actor who plans. (IT HISSES, 2005, 7) At this moment an interesting comment appeared of the group: ' ' but which is our objective? ' ' Importance of the elaboration of a project, a plan was perceived it, therefore ' ' the plan is one, election of destined operations to modify the initial situation and to reach the situation-objective (MATUS, 1991, 37). It was of vital importance, in this instant, that the group perceived that it was one part all, with important paper in the society, where the space constructed for the dialogue meant the recognition of rights and responsibilities. It comments Hisses: The civil society is integrant part of the State. As much the parties, the unions, the social movements, as well as the ONGs are in the civil society, exerting paper to democratize it. In this manner, the reinforcement of the civil society, the construction of public spaces and a permevel State to the dialogue is central for the concretion of rights.
This study established as central question to demonstrate the relevance of a Strategical Planning applied the church growth, or properly speaking, a local church. The strategical planning allows that the organization takes party plaintiff in the configuration of its future, that is, it can undertake activities and to influence in them e, consequentemente, can control its destination, fact, this, recognized as beneficial for many administrators, therefore who has the responsibility to direct the organizations goes too far it the changes of entorno and establishes flexible plans and structures that allow the adaptation, the innovation and the confrontation of any situation not foreseen.
It is undeniable that all organization, today, if to want to survive or to consolidate its company, must elaborate a strategical plan that will serve of guide in the uncertain world-wide economic panorama. It is therefore that strategical planning, in accordance with Mintzberg (2006), became a basic tool of the administration to stimulate its development and to search a direction well definite. What the strategical planning does not offer is the possibility to create a strategical plan of internal and external factors for, later, to create strategies to reach its objectives and established goals. Also, today, the ecclesiastical institutions had only left of being seen as a conglomerate of people, who if congregated for louvores and devotions, and that they were worried exclusively about the daily tasks, with all on to the questions spirituals. If it had growth with new members adhering to the movement, this act was attributed the God; but, if, in contrast, it had shrinking, also this attributed age the God. That is, the act to manage and to manage an organization religious was on, of a form or another one, to the questions spirituals. It lacked, however, knowledge technician for parts of that they manage the churches, beyond the techniques of planning models that could alavancar better resulted for these organizations.