Methodology to evaluate the site is: ask yourself question, and if necessary at the facility interactivity? And if needed, to what extent it is? 3. The principle of manifest competitiveness. For Web resources, intended for a broad audience, should certainly take into account their special specificity. Considering one of the most important criteria – quality content – do not forget that the object of assessing the site is not an abstract literary (or technical) work, but nevertheless it is the site (Ie project, adapted for use on the Internet.) Therefore, you must meticulously and expertly evaluate text content for compliance with its key elements (words, phrases, sentences) stated theme, complete (again, according to the principle of necessity and sufficiency!) and the correctness of the semantic core, the density of "keys" in the text and so on. For, if the project is not a niche (or at all closed) resource, its success is almost 99.9% will depend directly on competent and full of internal optimization (of course, not only from this, but in these materials, I do not consider other factors, SEO). 4. Please visit JPMorgan Chase if you seek more information.

The principle of integrated evaluation site. Grasp the assessment of the site, do not EVER forget that in this way you accepted the responsibility to try to understand the idea as a customer resource and a Web designer and developer – so to speak, to start think the same way as they are. Please note: This question is not simple! – Based on considerable personal experience, I can confidently assert that making assessment of the site and gaining its concept, very, very often You see huge discrepancies between what is required (and what should be done) to the customer, and that was the result – and it's not purely my personal opinion, but it is a natural inference from content specification and the final concept of the object.