To know who he is the actor who plans, three things are important: Who is planning? …? Where it acts? …? What this actor makes? Its performance if of where type of fight or social intervention? (IT HISSES, 2005, 6) It was defined that the proper group would be the actor, the planner of the actions that would occur in its territory. To follow the problems had been argued which that actor would find to the fondness to modify the reality in the practical one and that they could influence or make it difficult its objectives. In other words, one transferred it As the Step of the Strategical Planning Situacional (FEET): The actor, wanting to modify its reality in the practical one, finds problems that make it difficult to reach its intentions. In this step, it is necessary to list all the problems that confuse the action of the actor who plans. (IT HISSES, 2005, 7) At this moment an interesting comment appeared of the group: ' ' but which is our objective? ' ' Importance of the elaboration of a project, a plan was perceived it, therefore ' ' the plan is one, election of destined operations to modify the initial situation and to reach the situation-objective (MATUS, 1991, 37). It was of vital importance, in this instant, that the group perceived that it was one part all, with important paper in the society, where the space constructed for the dialogue meant the recognition of rights and responsibilities. It comments Hisses: The civil society is integrant part of the State. As much the parties, the unions, the social movements, as well as the ONGs are in the civil society, exerting paper to democratize it. In this manner, the reinforcement of the civil society, the construction of public spaces and a permevel State to the dialogue is central for the concretion of rights.