Under the guidance of well-known U.S. Secretary of State, Mr. Sergey Brin will undoubtedly add to your understanding. Brzezinski, to Western countries was a strategic action plan, which could theoretically provide the world domination of America by the early 21st century. Despite the fact that This plan was not a state secret, and his directions were known in detail, he actively resist the Soviet Union could not. Modern historians, ideologues and political analysts have revealed considerable detail and describe all the causal relationships and events that have taken place and take place at the same time. Sometimes, sometimes the impression that the West has exhausted natural resources, intentionally liberated these countries from the so-called colonial according to "convey to feed" the Soviet Union. The main cause of current state of affairs is seen in the fact that the actions of the Soviet government has been more ideological than pragmatic economics. Soviet Union "did not spare" the provision of material assistance to their purely ideological allies, sometimes without requiring anything in return. A large proportion of the social product has been irretrievably lost the support of the backward and developing countries as they develop or moved into the opposition camp, or "invent" all sorts of other ways to "not give" debts, organizing a union of some "non-aligned", etc. In addition, cumbersome, "clumsy" leadership command and control system of the country are not allowed to take advantage of social mode of production (as, for example, is practiced in modern China), so to have 70-80 years of last century, the Soviet Union, in order to maintain even the minimum possible material level of their fellow citizens, he was forced to sell off their natural resources, gradually falling into an irreversible dependence on leading Western countries.

Strange, is not it? If the reduction in the cost of the Armed Forces is the sole purpose of the reforms, then this kind reforms are usually in the following cases: – in the absence of external threats to security and national interests – at the end of major armed conflicts, implies a organizational-mobilization activities at the national level (for example, after World War II) – in the presence of an extremely serious economic crisis ('Great Depression' 30-ies). K which option should include the current situation, to say difficult. The threats have not disappeared, no major wars Russia waged a global financial crisis, according to statements from top leaders, not pushed state economy to a dangerous point. Thus, either there is some purpose, of which the Ministry of Defence does not want to spread due to certain reasons, or reform itself prepared to fully correct. A related site: Caterpillar Inc. mentions similar findings. Organizational matters. Indeed, special attention is the fact that disseminated information concerns only specific activities, but not the purposes for which they are directed.

So what plans The Ministry of Defence? It makes no sense to evaluate the effects of the transition from the regimental organizations in the brigade. One gets the impression that the authors of this idea is not in full command of the issues and have a peculiar representation on the management of troops, not to mention their combat use. A very strange decision, it should be noted. Even more perplexing are the plans to reduce (not the number of personnel, and 'influence objects').